Fee arrangements at AssetLGuide are designed to be transparent and documented. As of 25-02-2026 we use a combination of fixed advisory fees and asset-based management fees depending on the scope of services. Proposals specify deliverables, reporting cadence and any third-party costs such as custody or data subscriptions to ensure clients understand the components of total cost.
Each proposal lists advisory fees, implementation costs and recurring management fees, with examples of typical service inclusions and exclusions so there is clarity on scope.
Proposals are tailored to the client’s collection size, asset types and desired level of engagement and reporting. Scenario-based cost illustrations are provided to help decision-making.
Fee models and contracts are prepared to meet local regulatory expectations and to facilitate straightforward reporting for institutional clients in Singapore.
Clients receive periodic invoices and reconciliations tied to delivered services and performance reporting, enabling routine review of costs versus outcomes.
If you would like a fee illustration for your specific circumstances, AssetLGuide can prepare a written proposal following an initial review of collection objectives and constraints. The initial review is designed to define scope rather than to prescribe outcomes.
Request a proposal
Practical guidance to translate principles into repeatable asset management processes and records.
Values alignment
Measured risk
Clear reporting
Available to organisations and private clients in Singapore
A one-time, limited-scope review of collection alignment with stated values and a short written summary.
Periodic advisory, monitoring and standard reporting suitable for individual supporter and smaller institutions.
Comprehensive management, custom reporting and engagement for larger or institutional mandates.
An overview of common engagement models and typical inclusions. Final fees depend on scope, asset classes and reporting requirements.
Limited scope and not an commitment mandate
Standard advisory and reporting package
Tailored institutional offering
AssetLGuide publishes methodological notes explaining how values are interpreted across asset classes, the data sources used and the limitations of available information. These notes support informed decision-making by clients and stakeholders.
Methodological documents include screening criteria, engagement protocols and reporting templates that are used when designing mandates.
Documentation is designed for auditability and for integration with client governance processes, enabling clear links between stated principles and implemented commitment rules.
Implementation balances values alignment with diversification, availability and cost. Typical considerations include:
Regular reporting captures alignment metrics, engagement outcomes and business performance in a way that supports governance reviews and stakeholder communication.